It has been a few days now since the news officially dropped about the cuts and revisions made for the Ivan Van Hove-helmed revival of West Side Story preparing to open on Broadway. Some of my readers have pointed out to me that I have been noticeably quiet about what some have deemed is a massacre of a classic and some feel is an innovative take. They are correct. I have been mostly silent on the topic, taking some time to process how I felt about the changes and synthesizing these changes to decide whether or not they will truly influence the integrity of the piece. In recent years I have also tended to write about history, steering away from personal opinions in the hope that what I share ignites enthusiasm about musical theatre classics instead of turning people away from them. Even if a show is dated or is not in line with the thinking of our contemporary views, I believe most older shows (even the flops) have merit and are worthy of remembering. However, enough people have reached out to me over this West Side Story debacle that I suppose I am being called upon to speak in its defense. I will share my thoughts, at risk of much criticism (and maybe not for the reasons you might think). I do not expect everyone to agree with me and hope that each of you will apply your own reason and thought to whether you want to an altered West Side Story, making (or not making) your ticket purchases accordingly.